@Article{VonRandowToVoArMaHuKr:2020:EvGrPr,
author = "Von Randow, Rita de C{\'a}ssia Silva and Tomasella, Javier and
Von Randow, Celso and Ara{\'u}jo, Alessandro Carioca de and
Manzi, Ant{\^o}nio Ocimar and Hutjes, Ronald and Kruijt, Bart",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Centro
Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais
(CEMADEN)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}
and {Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agrecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Wageningen
University} and {Wageningen University}",
title = "Evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity of secondary
vegetation in Amazonia inferred by eddy covariance",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
year = "2020",
volume = "294",
pages = "e108141",
month = "Nov.",
keywords = "Evapotranspiration, Gross primary productivity, Secondary growth,
Water use efficiency, Land cover change.",
abstract = "The conversion of primary forest (PF) to other types of land
cover, such as pasture and agriculture, in Amazonia, affects
regional carbon and water balances, significantly contributing to
increased carbon emissions and reduced evapotranspiration.
However, secondary forest (SF) growth, resulting from the
abandonment of low-productivity pasture areas, offers a potential
alternative to counterbalance the effects of deforestation on
carbon release to the atmosphere and evapotranspiration reduction.
In this work, we present four years of eddy flux measurements of a
SF that is approximately 20 years old, located in Central
Amazonia, and we compare these measurements with those of a PF in
the same region, analyzing daily and seasonal variations in
evapotranspiration, gross primary productivity of carbon and water
use efficiency. On average, evapotranspiration is 20% higher in
the SF (3.6 mm day\−1) than in the PF (3.1 mm
day\−1), while gross primary productivity is only 5% higher
in the SF (8.1 gC m\−2 day\−1) than in the PF (7.8
gC m\−2 day\−1). Despite robust evidence of higher
evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity in SF, the
estimated uncertainty range of WUE is large to reach definite
conclusions about the differences on carbon gain per water loss
between the sites. Nonetheless, the significantly higher
evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity of SF may
counterbalance both water and C losses from deforestation and has
important implications for regional budgets.",
doi = "10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108141",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108141",
issn = "0168-1923",
language = "en",
targetfile = "von randow_evapotranspiration.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "17 maio 2024"
}